<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why display: table shouldn&#8217;t be frowned upon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecssninja.com/xhtml/why-display-table-shouldnt-be-frowned-upon/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecssninja.com/xhtml/why-display-table-shouldnt-be-frowned-upon</link>
	<description>All things CSS, JavaScript &#38; HTML</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 04:46:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thecssninja.com/xhtml/why-display-table-shouldnt-be-frowned-upon/comment-page-1#comment-4813</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecssninja.com/?p=17#comment-4813</guid>
		<description>I have noticed a weirdness that if I want to vertically align content in a table-cell, I need to specify an absolute height:  no 100% or min-height.

http://jsfiddle.net/smlombardi/LnD3b/11/

Anyone else? Workarounds?  I don&#039;t want to have to specify a height.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have noticed a weirdness that if I want to vertically align content in a table-cell, I need to specify an absolute height:  no 100% or min-height.</p>
<p><a href="http://jsfiddle.net/smlombardi/LnD3b/11/" rel="nofollow">http://jsfiddle.net/smlombardi/LnD3b/11/</a></p>
<p>Anyone else? Workarounds?  I don&#8217;t want to have to specify a height.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catalin</title>
		<link>http://www.thecssninja.com/xhtml/why-display-table-shouldnt-be-frowned-upon/comment-page-1#comment-2769</link>
		<dc:creator>Catalin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 07:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecssninja.com/?p=17#comment-2769</guid>
		<description>Thanks, usefull</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, usefull</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.thecssninja.com/xhtml/why-display-table-shouldnt-be-frowned-upon/comment-page-1#comment-2580</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecssninja.com/?p=17#comment-2580</guid>
		<description>In fact NOT using tables to display tabular data is bad. The whole point is whether a screen reader can figure out what it&#039;s looking at based on your markup. A bunch of divs or lists used improperly is poor practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact NOT using tables to display tabular data is bad. The whole point is whether a screen reader can figure out what it&#8217;s looking at based on your markup. A bunch of divs or lists used improperly is poor practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iouri Goussev</title>
		<link>http://www.thecssninja.com/xhtml/why-display-table-shouldnt-be-frowned-upon/comment-page-1#comment-2302</link>
		<dc:creator>Iouri Goussev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecssninja.com/?p=17#comment-2302</guid>
		<description>Of course using tables instead of CSS to display tabular data, is not a sin either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course using tables instead of CSS to display tabular data, is not a sin either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vali</title>
		<link>http://www.thecssninja.com/xhtml/why-display-table-shouldnt-be-frowned-upon/comment-page-1#comment-2265</link>
		<dc:creator>Vali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecssninja.com/?p=17#comment-2265</guid>
		<description>thz, you made my evening better :)
ups...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thz, you made my evening better :)<br />
ups&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.thecssninja.com/xhtml/why-display-table-shouldnt-be-frowned-upon/comment-page-1#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecssninja.com/?p=17#comment-253</guid>
		<description>Sweet. Thanks for sharing :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet. Thanks for sharing :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Css Ninja</title>
		<link>http://www.thecssninja.com/xhtml/why-display-table-shouldnt-be-frowned-upon/comment-page-1#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>The Css Ninja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 01:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecssninja.com/?p=17#comment-252</guid>
		<description>Thanks for comment Jonathan. You are correct that this will cut off any content that flows past the current window height. Luckily this can be fixed and I have updated the demo files and the source download, I will also update the article when I have more time. You can view the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thecssninja.com/demo/css_tables/overflow.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;overflow example here&lt;/a&gt;. This hasn&#039;t been thoroughly tested but it works in Safari 4, FF3/2/1.5 and IE8.

The changes made was removing the overflow: hidden from the &lt;em&gt;html, body&lt;/em&gt; selector as this was causing the overflow to be hidden and was unnecessary. I added another container inside the &lt;em&gt;#content&lt;/em&gt; container and gave it &lt;em&gt;display: table-cell&lt;/em&gt; so padding could be applied, &lt;em&gt;table-row&lt;/em&gt; will ignore padding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for comment Jonathan. You are correct that this will cut off any content that flows past the current window height. Luckily this can be fixed and I have updated the demo files and the source download, I will also update the article when I have more time. You can view the <a href="http://www.thecssninja.com/demo/css_tables/overflow.html" rel="nofollow">overflow example here</a>. This hasn&#8217;t been thoroughly tested but it works in Safari 4, FF3/2/1.5 and IE8.</p>
<p>The changes made was removing the overflow: hidden from the <em>html, body</em> selector as this was causing the overflow to be hidden and was unnecessary. I added another container inside the <em>#content</em> container and gave it <em>display: table-cell</em> so padding could be applied, <em>table-row</em> will ignore padding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.thecssninja.com/xhtml/why-display-table-shouldnt-be-frowned-upon/comment-page-1#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecssninja.com/?p=17#comment-251</guid>
		<description>I was a little skeptical of the first fluid layout and its ability to support more content than the browser height. I added more content and (as expected) it runs off the paged without the vertical scroll-bar.

Have you found a way to enable the scroll-bar when needed by the content?

I&#039;m using Firefox 3.0.10</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a little skeptical of the first fluid layout and its ability to support more content than the browser height. I added more content and (as expected) it runs off the paged without the vertical scroll-bar.</p>
<p>Have you found a way to enable the scroll-bar when needed by the content?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m using Firefox 3.0.10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

